Become Famous
Public notes, reactions, and quoted fragments from people responding to the essays, videos, and exploratory models.
Like cmon what is this post It's just reiterating what behaviour already exist It's nothing hidden dawg Like cmon Everything can be already figured out no need for this hidden whatever It doesn't even have patterns Like this is just reiterating what already exists
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types
So you are telling me that when we arrange data in a specific way, it is then suddenly arranged in that way?
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types
I am still annoyed at your structure, here is my response to your comment on your other post. Instead of this unbalance with a heavily F and S ground which is arbitrary and could have as much be read through a heavily imbalance of T and N, or F and N or T and S. Either way your framework doesn't respect enantodromia. Se - Fi "there is Fi/white in Se/black"…
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types
I think he will be shocked when he discovers Reinin dichotomies
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types Now with 4000
Seems like AI analysis put over generic physical representation. Don’t be too impressed.
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types
This… just has to do with the way the system is structured into several different binary divisions. I/E, P/J, and S/N and T/F for P and J, respectively. You could arrange these in any other order and find ways of grouping them. There’s nothing to suggest they should be in this specific arrangement. In fact, from the vantage point of one of the primary…
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types Now with 4000
hate to be all skeptical and stuff, but without the reasoning behind each decision this really seems more like someone had fun playing with shapes than something with actual meaning... nice to look at though
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types Now with 4000
I'm sorry, but I sometimes have the feeling that it was thrown together at random. Like, there are types that are supposed to share something, but literally have no function in common. So how are they supposed to share the same thing?
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types
I eventually figured this out but it seems pointless
Responding toThe 16 Types as an Cognitive Weather Systemthis took me a while to understand, I'm especially bothered by how they are placed in space, 3 corners are feelers and 1 is a thinker You also have ISFJ INFJ INTJ ISTJ on the same line but the one on the opposite side is ISFP ISTP INTP ESTP instead of maybe ISFP INFP INTP ISTP. The line above INFJ is ENFJ ENTJ which makes sense but the line below ISTP is…
Responding toThe 16 Types as an Cognitive Weather System
I have no idea what this is except it looks cool
Responding toThe 16 Types as an Cognitive Weather System
Brother, you ok? Every month you come up with new BS
Responding toThe 16 Types as an Cognitive Weather System
Yes 2000% more symmetry, much science
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types Now with 2000
I like interactive visuals like this, and people try to get deeper with this theory, but I don't get what it helps reveal, and I don't understand why for example ISFJ and ISTJ are in the intuitive side, I understand that INTP/INFP can be considered less intuitive than the others because they are still high Si users, but in this logic I would see ISTP more…
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types
In exchange of 2000% symmetry it took you 2000% of the pixels. My OCD is 2 inches away from exploding
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types Now with 2000Not very symmetric. If you want to impress people, look for "Q4 graph"
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types
Would presenting this as a Venn diagram or even a pie chart provide any additional information… it’s like you discovered the symmetry of binary values, and still presented it in a non-edifying manner. This an alignment chart with 4 factors still on 2 dimensions. Represent the 4 dimensional symmetry in a hypercube or something that isn’t just flat and this…
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types Now with 2000
You highlighted INFP, ISFP and ISTP together for the label " internal judgement", but you didn't include INTP. INTP would be the fourth member of that set for types with a dominant introverted judging function.
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types Now with 2000
Wow, you came back and doubled down on the nonsense
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types Now with 2000
I don't get the symmetry? Why do you have some types drawing lines across the whole thing without any mirror image and so on
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types
This looks more like a map to more complications and complexes. I lived long enough to understand that simplicity above complexity. I rather try to understand my psyche through say Robert Moors - King Warrior Magician Lover or the Alchemical elements that harmoniously mirror the 4 seasons instead. I do see the resemblance of those here but I suppose I get…
Responding toThe 4 Quadrants of Human Psyche the Map Of
Again, MBTI gives you four binary variables. Cognitive function theory gives you structured stacks. Once you arrange those visually, symmetry is almost guaranteed because the system was already built from oppositions. These labels are neat, and relatively accurate, simply because they're already described that way, but what is the revelation here? The…
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types Now with 2000Smysnk, there's nothing hidden about this. You're just pattern matching. We already talked about this when you went nuclear on me.
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types
I don’t get it? Arranging by auxiliary authority function doesn’t make a whole lot of sense, especially if you do something like put ESFP and ENFP on opposite sides of the spectrum. Cuz that defeats the purpose of your aux authority grouping thing and they really aren’t that different just because they are on the opposite perceiving axis. It’s just a really…
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types
I'm not sure what this means, but I do like INFPs IRL where they can't flake on me. INTPxINTP for the win though
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types
I don't get the placement. Can you explain more because I think it can be drawn in a different way.
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types
I don't understand the point of this graph, you've given special priority to aux/text Si-Ne and Fi-Te for no apparent reason. By "special priority", I mean that you made those links bigger and they look like axes, except there really are no axes on this diagram. Because there are no axes, the placement of each of the types on this diagram is immaterial.…
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types
For a moment, I thought I was on r/ffxiv and looking at some raid plan
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types
It's still hidden. Ain neither of these graphs symmetric. 😂
Responding toThe Hidden Symmetry of the 16 Types